|
|
@_unwriter | |||||
|
Today I leave 21 Century Motor Company, the chatroom I created.
I created a new place for the builders who believe in the same strong visionâone bitcoin to rule them all.
Any bitcoin developer is welcome, as long as you acknowledge the rules.
Join: bitdb.network/atlantis pic.twitter.com/akC0AMwUAW
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
realSatoshi
@realSatoshi3
|
Nov 29 |
|
If PoW works why did you choose the chain with less work
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
nima
@natoshisakamato
|
Nov 29 |
|
It's always good to have a competing entity & not becoming complacent
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
satoshi0x
@satoshi0x
|
Nov 29 |
|
He didnât. Have you looked at what itâs doing lately? There is a stealth operation going down as SV completes the intended path of one merge chain.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
nima
@natoshisakamato
|
Nov 29 |
|
Because the other party didn't follow the rule
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
realSatoshi
@realSatoshi3
|
Nov 29 |
|
Wut
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
realSatoshi
@realSatoshi3
|
Nov 29 |
|
What rule
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
nima
@natoshisakamato
|
Nov 29 |
|
|
||
|
|
realSatoshi
@realSatoshi3
|
Nov 29 |
|
Thatâs a rule?
âIâll probably put a checkpoint in each version from now on. Once the software has settled what the widely accepted block chain is, thereâs no point in leaving open the unwanted non-zero possibility of revision months later.â -Satoshi
Satoshi > @pwuille
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
nima
@natoshisakamato
|
Nov 29 |
|
"months later" not "every 30 minutes later"
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Oscar Nakamoto
@Blokkjede
|
Nov 29 |
|
"Once the software has settled what the widely accepted block chain is"
NOT:
"Once [some dude] has settled what the widely accepted block chain is"
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
nima
@natoshisakamato
|
Nov 29 |
|
Ppl only see "Satoshi" & "checkpoints" ----> so it must be OK
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Oscar Nakamoto
@Blokkjede
|
Nov 29 |
|
Also, SV did adhere to most POW. ABC won, so SV f(or/uc)ked off, and started working on BSV instead.
No harm done. ð¤·ââï¸
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
sayurichiCK
@sayurichiCK
|
Nov 29 |
|
There was _A_ checkpoint in the duration of the "war". Feel free to try to falsify this with references to commits and or version releases. ð.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
nima
@natoshisakamato
|
Nov 29 |
|
Doesnât matter ONE or 2 or many
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Crypto Hobo
@ScrollsBio
|
Nov 29 |
|
Hi nima, politely, I don't understand your stance here. You have an issue with many checkpoints, but when it was made clear that during the war there were not many you stated that it doesn't matter if its several or just one? BCH used checkpoints with all other previous forks.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
nima
@natoshisakamato
|
Nov 30 |
|
Sorry for the confusion. The emphasis here is on "possibility of revision months later.â not on the number of checkpoints actually.
Satoshi says "months later" not "minutes later" because he wanted to see how any possible forking plays out in the short run.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
-ED- Bitcoin SV (3rd time lucky)
@EdinKuky
|
Dec 1 |
|
2 & 3 are not rules... and 1 is also not a rule, more like target to achieve. Also As Bitcoin system is PoW, it is actually not Capitalist system as Capitalist system is PoS based system... and yet no one understands this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
-ED- Bitcoin SV (3rd time lucky)
@EdinKuky
|
Dec 15 |
|
Capitalism doesn't use PoW principle, if it did, no capitalist would get as rich as they have, because they get rich from work of others... and most people because they have been brainwashed, do not understand this at all.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
ð¦ Joel Dalais ð
@JoelDalais
|
Dec 15 |
|
dude (Ed).. sooner or later i hope you realize that its not everyone else who's been "brainwashed" .. but maybe its you
|
||
|
|
||